Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge : a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans

Publication type:
Journal article
Metadata:
Autoren
  • Klaus Edgar Roth
  • Ramona Mueller
  • Eike Schwand
  • Gerrit Stefen Maier
  • Irene Schmidtmann
  • Murat Sariyar
  • Uwe Maus
Sammlungen
  • metadata
ISSN
1757-1146
Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
1
Zeitschrift
Journal of foot and ankle research
Schlüsselwörter
  • 610 Medizin
  • 610 Medical sciences
Sprache
eng
Paginierung
Art. 56
Datum der Veröffentlichung
2014
Herausgeber
BioMed central
Herausgeber URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-014-0056-3
Datum der Datenerfassung
2020
Datum, an dem der Datensatz öffentlich gemacht wurde
2020
Zugang
Public
Titel
Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge : a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans
Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
7

Data source: METADATA.UB

Other metadata sources:
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>It has been claimed that endoscopic calcaneoplasty offers some advantages over open techniques in the surgical treatment of Haglund's deformity due to reduced postoperative complications like stiffness and pain. Bony over‐resection places patients at risk of these complications. The resulting question with regard to the quantitative differences of the extent of the bone removed using these two techniques has not yet been answered. The purpose of the study was to determine the resection volume of calcaneal bone for open and endoscopic surgical techniques.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>16 feet obtained from body donors were operated on in equal parts using either open surgical or endoscopic techniques, with the technique selected on a random basis. High‐resolution CT scans were obtained before and after the interventional procedure and analysed to obtain 3‐D polygon models. Post‐operative models were subtracted from pre‐operative models to provide the volume change resulting from the intervention. This was then correlated with the bone mineral density (BMD) of the preparation.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The extent of bony resection was greater in open surgical techniques than in endoscopic approaches. The average volume of bone resection was 0.80 (±0.34) cm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup> in the endoscopic group and 3.04 (±2.91) cm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup> in the group that underwent open surgery. After adjustment for bone mineral density the extent of the resection was significantly larger (p = 0.018) in the group undergoing open surgery. The two groups did not differ significantly with regard to BMD (p &gt; 0.1). The extent of the resection fell by 0.011 cm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup> per 1 mg/cm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup> areal bone mineral density, i.e., a slightly lower degree of bone resection was associated with a higher bone mineral density.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Assuming that the resection volume was adequate to treat the patient's complaints a smaller resection volume seen in our study using an endoscopic technique might lead to fewer postoperative complaints and faster recovery.</jats:p></jats:sec>
Autoren
  • Klaus Edgar Roth
  • Ramona Mueller
  • Eike Schwand
  • Gerrit Stefen Maier
  • Irene Schmidtmann
  • Murat Sariyar
  • Uwe Maus
DOI
10.1186/s13047-014-0056-3
eISSN
1757-1146
ISSN
1757-1146
Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
1
Zeitschrift
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Sprache
en
Online publication date
2014
Datum der Veröffentlichung
2014
Status
Published
Herausgeber
Wiley
Herausgeber URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-014-0056-3
Datum der Datenerfassung
2024
Titel
Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge: a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans
Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
7

Data source: Crossref

Author's licence
CC-BY
Autoren
  • Klaus Edgar Roth
  • Ramona Mueller
  • Eike Schwand
  • Gerrit Stefen Maier
  • Irene Schmidtmann
  • Murat Sariyar
  • Uwe Maus
Hosting institution
Universitätsbibliothek Mainz
Sammlungen
  • DFG-OA-Publizieren (2012 - 2017)
Resource version
Published version
DOI
10.1186/s13047-014-0056-3
Funding acknowledgements
  • DFG, Open Access-Publizieren Universität Mainz / Universitätsmedizin
File(s) embargoed
false
Open access
true
ISSN
1757-1146
Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
1
Zeitschrift
Journal of foot and ankle research
Schlüsselwörter
  • 610 Medizin
  • 610 Medical sciences
Sprache
eng
Open access status
Open Access
Paginierung
Art. 56
Datum der Veröffentlichung
2014
Public URL
https://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/8019
Herausgeber
BioMed central
Herausgeber URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-014-0056-3
Datum der Datenerfassung
2022
Datum, an dem der Datensatz öffentlich gemacht wurde
2022
Zugang
Public
Titel
Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge : a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans
Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
7

Files

open_versus_endoscopic_bone_r-20220925162840207.pdf

Data source: OPENSCIENCE.UB

Tools