The AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models

Publication type:
Journal article
Metadata:
Autoren
  • K Tsigaridis
  • N Daskalakis
  • M Kanakidou
  • PJ Adams
  • P Artaxo
  • R Bahadur
  • Y Balkanski
  • SE Bauer
  • N Bellouin
  • A Benedetti
  • T Bergman
  • TK Berntsen
  • JP Beukes
  • H Bian
  • KS Carslaw
  • M Chin
  • G Curci
  • T Diehl
  • RC Easter
  • SJ Ghan
  • SL Gong
  • A Hodzic
  • CR Hoyle
  • T Iversen
  • S Jathar
  • JL Jimenez
  • JW Kaiser
  • A Kirkevag
  • D Koch
  • H Kokkola
  • YH Lee
  • G Lin
  • X Liu
  • G Luo
  • X Ma
  • GW Mann
  • N Mihalopoulos
  • J-J Morcrette
  • J-F Mueller
  • G Myhre
  • S Myriokefalitakis
  • NL Ng
  • D O'Donnell
  • JE Penner
  • L Pozzoli
  • KJ Pringle
  • LM Russell
  • M Schulz
  • J Sciare
  • O Seland
  • DT Shindell
  • S Sillman
  • RB Skeie
  • D Spracklen
  • T Stavrakou
  • SD Steenrod
  • T Takemura
  • P Tiitta
  • S Tilmes
  • H Tost
  • T van Noije
  • PG van Zyl
  • K von Salzen
  • F Yu
  • Z Wang
  • Z Wang
  • RA Zaveri
  • H Zhang
  • K Zhang
  • Q Zhang
  • X Zhang
Autoren-URL
https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=fis-test-1&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000344164800028&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
DOI
10.5194/acp-14-10845-2014
eISSN
1680-7324
Externe Identifier
  • Clarivate Analytics Document Solution ID: AS3GF
ISSN
1680-7316
Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
19
Zeitschrift
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Paginierung
10845 - 10895
Datum der Veröffentlichung
2014
Status
Published
Titel
The AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models
Sub types
  • Article
Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
14

Data source: Web of Science (Lite)

Other metadata sources:
Abstract
<jats:p>Abstract. This paper evaluates the current status of global modeling of the organic aerosol (OA) in the troposphere and analyzes the differences between models as well as between models and observations. Thirty-one global chemistry transport models (CTMs) and general circulation models (GCMs) have participated in this intercomparison, in the framework of AeroCom phase II. The simulation of OA varies greatly between models in terms of the magnitude of primary emissions, secondary OA (SOA) formation, the number of OA species used (2 to 62), the complexity of OA parameterizations (gas-particle partitioning, chemical aging, multiphase chemistry, aerosol microphysics), and the OA physical, chemical and optical properties. The diversity of the global OA simulation results has increased since earlier AeroCom experiments, mainly due to the increasing complexity of the SOA parameterization in models, and the implementation of new, highly uncertain, OA sources. Diversity of over one order of magnitude exists in the modeled vertical distribution of OA concentrations that deserves a dedicated future study. Furthermore, although the OA / OC ratio depends on OA sources and atmospheric processing, and is important for model evaluation against OA and OC observations, it is resolved only by a few global models. The median global primary OA (POA) source strength is 56 Tg a−1 (range 34–144 Tg a−1) and the median SOA source strength (natural and anthropogenic) is 19 Tg a−1 (range 13–121 Tg a−1). Among the models that take into account the semi-volatile SOA nature, the median source is calculated to be 51 Tg a−1 (range 16–121 Tg a−1), much larger than the median value of the models that calculate SOA in a more simplistic way (19 Tg a−1; range 13–20 Tg a−1, with one model at 37 Tg a−1). The median atmospheric burden of OA is 1.4 Tg (24 models in the range of 0.6–2.0 Tg and 4 between 2.0 and 3.8 Tg), with a median OA lifetime of 5.4 days (range 3.8–9.6 days). In models that reported both OA and sulfate burdens, the median value of the OA/sulfate burden ratio is calculated to be 0.77; 13 models calculate a ratio lower than 1, and 9 models higher than 1. For 26 models that reported OA deposition fluxes, the median wet removal is 70 Tg a−1 (range 28–209 Tg a−1), which is on average 85% of the total OA deposition. Fine aerosol organic carbon (OC) and OA observations from continuous monitoring networks and individual field campaigns have been used for model evaluation. At urban locations, the model–observation comparison indicates missing knowledge on anthropogenic OA sources, both strength and seasonality. The combined model–measurements analysis suggests the existence of increased OA levels during summer due to biogenic SOA formation over large areas of the USA that can be of the same order of magnitude as the POA, even at urban locations, and contribute to the measured urban seasonal pattern. Global models are able to simulate the high secondary character of OA observed in the atmosphere as a result of SOA formation and POA aging, although the amount of OA present in the atmosphere remains largely underestimated, with a mean normalized bias (MNB) equal to −0.62 (−0.51) based on the comparison against OC (OA) urban data of all models at the surface, −0.15 (+0.51) when compared with remote measurements, and −0.30 for marine locations with OC data. The mean temporal correlations across all stations are low when compared with OC (OA) measurements: 0.47 (0.52) for urban stations, 0.39 (0.37) for remote stations, and 0.25 for marine stations with OC data. The combination of high (negative) MNB and higher correlation at urban stations when compared with the low MNB and lower correlation at remote sites suggests that knowledge about the processes that govern aerosol processing, transport and removal, on top of their sources, is important at the remote stations. There is no clear change in model skill with increasing model complexity with regard to OC or OA mass concentration. However, the complexity is needed in models in order to distinguish between anthropogenic and natural OA as needed for climate mitigation, and to calculate the impact of OA on climate accurately. </jats:p>
Autoren
  • K Tsigaridis
  • N Daskalakis
  • M Kanakidou
  • PJ Adams
  • P Artaxo
  • R Bahadur
  • Y Balkanski
  • SE Bauer
  • N Bellouin
  • A Benedetti
  • T Bergman
  • TK Berntsen
  • JP Beukes
  • H Bian
  • KS Carslaw
  • M Chin
  • G Curci
  • T Diehl
  • RC Easter
  • SJ Ghan
  • SL Gong
  • A Hodzic
  • CR Hoyle
  • T Iversen
  • S Jathar
  • JL Jimenez
  • JW Kaiser
  • A Kirkevåg
  • D Koch
  • H Kokkola
  • YH Lee
  • G Lin
  • X Liu
  • G Luo
  • X Ma
  • GW Mann
  • N Mihalopoulos
  • J-J Morcrette
  • J-F Müller
  • G Myhre
  • S Myriokefalitakis
  • NL Ng
  • D O'Donnell
  • JE Penner
  • L Pozzoli
  • KJ Pringle
  • LM Russell
  • M Schulz
  • J Sciare
  • Ø Seland
  • DT Shindell
  • S Sillman
  • RB Skeie
  • D Spracklen
  • T Stavrakou
  • SD Steenrod
  • T Takemura
  • P Tiitta
  • S Tilmes
  • H Tost
  • T van Noije
  • PG van Zyl
  • K von Salzen
  • F Yu
  • Z Wang
  • Z Wang
  • RA Zaveri
  • H Zhang
  • K Zhang
  • Q Zhang
  • X Zhang
DOI
10.5194/acp-14-10845-2014
eISSN
1680-7324
Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
19
Zeitschrift
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Sprache
en
Online publication date
2014
Paginierung
10845 - 10895
Status
Published online
Herausgeber
Copernicus GmbH
Herausgeber URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10845-2014
Datum der Datenerfassung
2021
Titel
The AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models
Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
14

Data source: Crossref

Beziehungen:
Property of

Tools