How Implicit-Explicit Consistency of the Intelligence Self-Concept Moderates Reactions to Performance Feedback

Publication type:
Journal article
Metadata:
Autoren
  • Friederike XR Gerstenberg
  • Roland Imhoff
  • Rainer Banse
  • Christine Altstoetter-Gleich
  • Axel Zinkernagel
  • Manfred Schmitt
Autoren-URL
https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=fis-test-1&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000320782100003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
DOI
10.1002/per.1900
eISSN
1099-0984
Externe Identifier
  • Clarivate Analytics Document Solution ID: 169LQ
ISSN
0890-2070
Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
3
Zeitschrift
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY
Schlüsselwörter
  • intelligence
  • feedback
  • implicit self-concept
  • explicit self-concept
  • Implicit Association Test
Paginierung
238 - 255
Datum der Veröffentlichung
2013
Status
Published
Titel
How Implicit-Explicit Consistency of the Intelligence Self-Concept Moderates Reactions to Performance Feedback
Sub types
  • Article
Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
27

Data source: Web of Science (Lite)

Other metadata sources:
Abstract
<jats:p>At present, it is not well understood which individual characteristics determine whether individuals will benefit or suffer from feedback about suboptimal performance. Three separate studies tested the idea that individuals‘ reactions to (neutral versus negative; positive versus negative) feedback as either improving or deteriorating performance in intelligence tests depended on their explicit and implicit self–concept of intelligence (eSCI and iSCI). In all studies (Study 1, N = 177; Study 2, N = 165; Study 3, N = 132), persons with low eSCI/high iSCI showed a boost in performance after negative feedback, whereas persons with any other combination showed a decline in performance. The studies also provide an explanation for these effects in terms of mediating mechanisms. Whereas the performance boost of individuals with low eSCI/high iSCI can be best explained by achievement–related reactance (Studies 2 and 3) and decrease in ruminative thinking (Study 3), the performance declines in the other configurations were mediated by decreased achievement motivation, increased frustration and increased outrage (Study 3). All these mediating mechanisms proved independent and incremental in a bootstrapping–based moderated meditation analysis. The results are discussed in light of the construct validity of our Implicit Association Test (IAT) and IATs in general. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</jats:p>
Autoren
  • Friederike XR Gerstenberg
  • Roland Imhoff
  • Rainer Banse
  • Christine Altstötter–Gleich
  • Axel Zinkernagel
  • Manfred Schmitt
DOI
10.1002/per.1900
eISSN
1099-0984
ISSN
0890-2070
Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
3
Zeitschrift
European Journal of Personality
Sprache
en
Online publication date
2013
Paginierung
238 - 255
Datum der Veröffentlichung
2013
Status
Published
Herausgeber
SAGE Publications
Herausgeber URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.1900
Datum der Datenerfassung
2023
Titel
How Implicit–Explicit Consistency of the Intelligence Self–Concept Moderates Reactions to Performance Feedback
Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
27

Data source: Crossref

Beziehungen:
Property of

Tools