Effect of Different Display Types on Vection and Its Interaction With Motion Direction and Field Dependence
- Publication type:
- Journal article
- Metadata:
-
- Autoren
- Behrang Keshavarz
- Martina Speck
- Bruce Haycock
- Stefan Berti
- Autoren-URL
- https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=fis-test-1&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000400788400001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
- DOI
- 10.1177/2041669517707768
- Externe Identifier
- Clarivate Analytics Document Solution ID: EU1NZ
- PubMed Identifier: 28515866
- ISSN
- 2041-6695
- Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
- 3
- Zeitschrift
- I-PERCEPTION
- Schlüsselwörter
- illusory self-motion
- field of view
- optic flow
- circular vection
- field dependence or field independence
- cognitive style
- visual stimulation
- perception
- Artikelnummer
- ARTN 2041669517707768
- Datum der Veröffentlichung
- 2017
- Status
- Published
- Titel
- Effect of Different Display Types on Vection and Its Interaction With Motion Direction and Field Dependence
- Sub types
- Article
- Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
- 8
Data source: Web of Science (Lite)
- Other metadata sources:
-
- Abstract
- <jats:p> Illusory self-motion (vection) can be generated by visual stimulation. The purpose of the present study was to compare behavioral vection measures including intensity ratings, duration, and onset time across different visual display types. Participants were exposed to a pattern of alternating black-and-white horizontal or vertical bars that moved either in vertical or horizontal direction, respectively. Stimuli were presented on four types of displays in randomized order: (a) large field of view dome projection, (b) combination of three computer screens, (c) single computer screen, (d) large field of view flat projection screen. A Computer Rod and Frame Test was used to measure field dependence, a cognitive style indicating the person’s tendency to rely on external cues (i.e., field dependent) or internal cues (i.e., field independent) with respect to the perception of one’s body position in space. Results revealed that all four displays successfully generated at least moderately strong vection. However, shortest vection onset, longest vection duration, and strongest vection intensity showed for the dome projection and the combination of three screens. This effect was further pronounced in field independent participants, indicating that field dependence can alter vection. </jats:p>
- Autoren
- Behrang Keshavarz
- Martina Speck
- Bruce Haycock
- Stefan Berti
- DOI
- 10.1177/2041669517707768
- eISSN
- 2041-6695
- ISSN
- 2041-6695
- Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
- 3
- Zeitschrift
- i-Perception
- Sprache
- en
- Online publication date
- 2017
- Paginierung
- 204166951770776 - 204166951770776
- Datum der Veröffentlichung
- 2017
- Status
- Published
- Herausgeber
- SAGE Publications
- Herausgeber URL
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2041669517707768
- Datum der Datenerfassung
- 2021
- Titel
- Effect of Different Display Types on Vection and Its Interaction With Motion Direction and Field Dependence
- Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
- 8
Data source: Crossref
- Abstract
- Illusory self-motion (vection) can be generated by visual stimulation. The purpose of the present study was to compare behavioral vection measures including intensity ratings, duration, and onset time across different visual display types. Participants were exposed to a pattern of alternating black-and-white horizontal or vertical bars that moved either in vertical or horizontal direction, respectively. Stimuli were presented on four types of displays in randomized order: (a) large field of view dome projection, (b) combination of three computer screens, (c) single computer screen, (d) large field of view flat projection screen. A Computer Rod and Frame Test was used to measure field dependence, a cognitive style indicating the person's tendency to rely on external cues (i.e., field dependent) or internal cues (i.e., field independent) with respect to the perception of one's body position in space. Results revealed that all four displays successfully generated at least moderately strong vection. However, shortest vection onset, longest vection duration, and strongest vection intensity showed for the dome projection and the combination of three screens. This effect was further pronounced in field independent participants, indicating that field dependence can alter vection.
- Addresses
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network (UHN), iDAPT, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Autoren
- Behrang Keshavarz
- Martina Speck
- Bruce Haycock
- Stefan Berti
- DOI
- 10.1177/2041669517707768
- eISSN
- 2041-6695
- Externe Identifier
- PubMed Identifier: 28515866
- PubMed Central ID: PMC5423592
- Open access
- true
- ISSN
- 2041-6695
- Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
- 3
- Zeitschrift
- i-Perception
- Sprache
- eng
- Medium
- Electronic-eCollection
- Online publication date
- 2017
- Open access status
- Open Access
- Paginierung
- 2041669517707768
- Datum der Veröffentlichung
- 2017
- Status
- Published
- Publisher licence
- CC BY
- Datum der Datenerfassung
- 2017
- Titel
- Effect of Different Display Types on Vection and Its Interaction With Motion Direction and Field Dependence.
- Sub types
- research-article
- Journal Article
- Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
- 8
Files
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2041669517707768 https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5423592?pdf=render
Data source: Europe PubMed Central
- Abstract
- Illusory self-motion (vection) can be generated by visual stimulation. The purpose of the present study was to compare behavioral vection measures including intensity ratings, duration, and onset time across different visual display types. Participants were exposed to a pattern of alternating black-and-white horizontal or vertical bars that moved either in vertical or horizontal direction, respectively. Stimuli were presented on four types of displays in randomized order: (a) large field of view dome projection, (b) combination of three computer screens, (c) single computer screen, (d) large field of view flat projection screen. A Computer Rod and Frame Test was used to measure field dependence, a cognitive style indicating the person's tendency to rely on external cues (i.e., field dependent) or internal cues (i.e., field independent) with respect to the perception of one's body position in space. Results revealed that all four displays successfully generated at least moderately strong vection. However, shortest vection onset, longest vection duration, and strongest vection intensity showed for the dome projection and the combination of three screens. This effect was further pronounced in field independent participants, indicating that field dependence can alter vection.
- Autoren
- Behrang Keshavarz
- Martina Speck
- Bruce Haycock
- Stefan Berti
- Autoren-URL
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515866
- DOI
- 10.1177/2041669517707768
- Externe Identifier
- PubMed Central ID: PMC5423592
- ISSN
- 2041-6695
- Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
- 3
- Zeitschrift
- Iperception
- Schlüsselwörter
- circular vection
- cognitive style
- field dependence or field independence
- field of view
- illusory self-motion
- optic flow
- perception
- visual stimulation
- Sprache
- eng
- Country
- United States
- Paginierung
- 2041669517707768
- PII
- 10.1177_2041669517707768
- Datum der Veröffentlichung
- 2017
- Status
- Published online
- Titel
- Effect of Different Display Types on Vection and Its Interaction With Motion Direction and Field Dependence.
- Sub types
- Journal Article
- Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
- 8
Data source: PubMed
- Beziehungen:
- Property of