Hindrance demands as a boundary condition to the appraisal of challenge demands
- Publikationstyp:
- Zeitschriftenaufsatz
- Metadaten:
-
- Autoren
- Miriam Schilbach
- Miriam Arnold
- Anja Baethge
- Thomas Rigotti
- Autoren-URL
- https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=fis-test-1&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000837683700001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
- DOI
- 10.1080/10615806.2022.2108019
- eISSN
- 1477-2205
- Externe Identifier
- Clarivate Analytics Document Solution ID: H2AH6
- PubMed Identifier: 35938551
- ISSN
- 1061-5806
- Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
- 4
- Zeitschrift
- ANXIETY STRESS AND COPING
- Schlüsselwörter
- Challenge-hindrance framework
- cognitive appraisal
- time pressure
- complexity
- daily diary study
- Paginierung
- 434 - 443
- Datum der Veröffentlichung
- 2023
- Status
- Published
- Titel
- Hindrance demands as a boundary condition to the appraisal of challenge demands
- Sub types
- Article
- Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
- 36
Datenquelle: Web of Science (Lite)
- Andere Metadatenquellen:
-
- Autoren
- Miriam Schilbach
- Miriam Arnold
- Anja Baethge
- Thomas Rigotti
- DOI
- 10.1080/10615806.2022.2108019
- eISSN
- 1477-2205
- ISSN
- 1061-5806
- Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
- 4
- Zeitschrift
- Anxiety, Stress, & Coping
- Sprache
- en
- Online publication date
- 2022
- Paginierung
- 434 - 443
- Datum der Veröffentlichung
- 2023
- Status
- Published
- Herausgeber
- Informa UK Limited
- Herausgeber URL
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2022.2108019
- Datum der Datenerfassung
- 2023
- Titel
- Hindrance demands as a boundary condition to the appraisal of challenge demands
- Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
- 36
Datenquelle: Crossref
- Abstract
- <h4>Background and objectives</h4>Studies show that prototypical challenge demands can be appraised as challenging, hindering and threatening. Yet, to date there exists no clear reasoning as to why these different appraisals occur. Drawing on transactional stress theory, we propose that co-occurring hindrance demands likely affect the day-specific appraisal of challenge demands (i.e., time pressure and complexity).<h4>Design and method</h4>To test this proposition we conducted a daily diary study with 432 employees. We tested our hypotheses using multi-level latent interaction analyses at the within-person level.<h4>Results</h4>Results revealed that on days when individuals experienced more hindrance demands, they were less likely to appraise time pressure and complexity as challenging and more likely to appraise them as hindering or threatening.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The results outline the need to consider co-occurring hindrance demands when assessing appraisal patterns associated with challenge demands.
- Addresses
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany.
- Autoren
- Miriam Schilbach
- Miriam Arnold
- Anja Baethge
- Thomas Rigotti
- DOI
- 10.1080/10615806.2022.2108019
- eISSN
- 1477-2205
- Externe Identifier
- PubMed Identifier: 35938551
- Funding acknowledgements
- Ministry of Science of the state of Rhineland-Palatine:
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research:
- Open access
- false
- ISSN
- 1061-5806
- Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
- 4
- Zeitschrift
- Anxiety, stress, and coping
- Schlüsselwörter
- Humans
- Stress, Psychological
- Occupational Stress
- Sprache
- eng
- Medium
- Print-Electronic
- Online publication date
- 2022
- Paginierung
- 434 - 443
- Datum der Veröffentlichung
- 2023
- Status
- Published
- Datum der Datenerfassung
- 2022
- Titel
- Hindrance demands as a boundary condition to the appraisal of challenge demands.
- Sub types
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Journal Article
- Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
- 36
Datenquelle: Europe PubMed Central
- Abstract
- BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Studies show that prototypical challenge demands can be appraised as challenging, hindering and threatening. Yet, to date there exists no clear reasoning as to why these different appraisals occur. Drawing on transactional stress theory, we propose that co-occurring hindrance demands likely affect the day-specific appraisal of challenge demands (i.e., time pressure and complexity). DESIGN AND METHOD: To test this proposition we conducted a daily diary study with 432 employees. We tested our hypotheses using multi-level latent interaction analyses at the within-person level. RESULTS: Results revealed that on days when individuals experienced more hindrance demands, they were less likely to appraise time pressure and complexity as challenging and more likely to appraise them as hindering or threatening. CONCLUSION: The results outline the need to consider co-occurring hindrance demands when assessing appraisal patterns associated with challenge demands.
- Autoren
- Miriam Schilbach
- Miriam Arnold
- Anja Baethge
- Thomas Rigotti
- Autoren-URL
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35938551
- DOI
- 10.1080/10615806.2022.2108019
- eISSN
- 1477-2205
- Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
- 4
- Zeitschrift
- Anxiety Stress Coping
- Schlüsselwörter
- Challenge-hindrance framework
- cognitive appraisal
- complexity
- daily diary study
- time pressure
- Humans
- Occupational Stress
- Stress, Psychological
- Sprache
- eng
- Country
- England
- Paginierung
- 434 - 443
- Datum der Veröffentlichung
- 2023
- Status
- Published
- Datum, an dem der Datensatz öffentlich gemacht wurde
- 2023
- Titel
- Hindrance demands as a boundary condition to the appraisal of challenge demands.
- Sub types
- Journal Article
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
- 36
Datenquelle: PubMed
- Beziehungen:
- Eigentum von