Putting the Vicious Cycle to the Test: Evidence for the Cognitive Behavioral Model of Persistent Somatic Symptoms from an Online Study
- Publikationstyp:
- Zeitschriftenaufsatz
- Metadaten:
-
- Abstract
- <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Objective</jats:title> <jats:p>In clinical practice, persistent somatic symptoms are regularly explained using a cognitive-behavioral model (CBM). In the CBM, predisposing, perpetuating, and precipitating factors are assumed to interact and to cause the onset and endurance of somatic symptoms. However, these models are rarely investigated in their entirety.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>We conducted an online-survey during the Corona pandemic. 2,114 participants from the general German population completed questionnaires that measured different factors of the CBM. We used state negative affectivity and neuroticism as predisposing factors, fear of a COVID-19 infection as precipitating factor, and somatic symptoms, misinterpretation of bodily symptoms, attention allocation to bodily symptoms, and health anxiety as perpetuating factors. Moreover, we added safety and avoidance behavior as endpoints to the model. We conducted a psychological network analysis to exploratively study the relationships between the model’s different factors and tested the assumptions of the CBM by evaluating a structural equation model (SEM) that incorporated all factors of the model.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Network analyses revealed clustering in our data: Health anxiety and different cognitive factors are closely related, while somatic symptoms and state negative affectivity are strongly associated. Our SEM showed adequate fit.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>Our findings from an exploratory and a confirmatory approach give empirical support for the CBM, suggesting it as a suitable model to explain bodily symptoms in the general population and to possibly guide clinical practice. The network model additionally indicates the necessity to apply an individualized CBM for patients, depending on a preponderance of either persistent somatic symptoms or health concerns.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
- Autoren
- Alexander HJ Sahm
- Michael Witthöft
- Josef Bailer
- Daniela Mier
- DOI
- 10.1097/psy.0000000000001313
- eISSN
- 1534-7796
- ISSN
- 0033-3174
- Zeitschrift
- Psychosomatic Medicine
- Sprache
- en
- Online publication date
- 2024
- Status
- Published online
- Herausgeber
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Herausgeber URL
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/psy.0000000000001313
- Datum der Datenerfassung
- 2024
- Titel
- Putting the Vicious Cycle to the Test: Evidence for the Cognitive Behavioral Model of Persistent Somatic Symptoms from an Online Study
Datenquelle: Crossref
- Andere Metadatenquellen:
-
- Abstract
- <h4>Objective</h4>In clinical practice, persistent somatic symptoms are regularly explained using a cognitive-behavioral model (CBM). In the CBM, predisposing, perpetuating, and precipitating factors are assumed to interact and to cause the onset and endurance of somatic symptoms. However, these models are rarely investigated in their entirety.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted an online-survey during the Corona pandemic. 2,114 participants from the general German population completed questionnaires that measured different factors of the CBM. We used state negative affectivity and neuroticism as predisposing factors, fear of a COVID-19 infection as precipitating factor, and somatic symptoms, misinterpretation of bodily symptoms, attention allocation to bodily symptoms, and health anxiety as perpetuating factors. Moreover, we added safety and avoidance behavior as endpoints to the model. We conducted a psychological network analysis to exploratively study the relationships between the model's different factors and tested the assumptions of the CBM by evaluating a structural equation model (SEM) that incorporated all factors of the model.<h4>Results</h4>Network analyses revealed clustering in our data: Health anxiety and different cognitive factors are closely related, while somatic symptoms and state negative affectivity are strongly associated. Our SEM showed adequate fit.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Our findings from an exploratory and a confirmatory approach give empirical support for the CBM, suggesting it as a suitable model to explain bodily symptoms in the general population and to possibly guide clinical practice. The network model additionally indicates the necessity to apply an individualized CBM for patients, depending on a preponderance of either persistent somatic symptoms or health concerns.
- Addresses
- Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
- Autoren
- Alexander HJ Sahm
- Michael Witthöft
- Josef Bailer
- Daniela Mier
- DOI
- 10.1097/psy.0000000000001313
- eISSN
- 1534-7796
- Externe Identifier
- PubMed Identifier: 38666664
- Open access
- false
- ISSN
- 0033-3174
- Zeitschrift
- Psychosomatic medicine
- Sprache
- eng
- Medium
- Print-Electronic
- Online publication date
- 2024
- Datum der Veröffentlichung
- 2024
- Status
- Published
- Datum der Datenerfassung
- 2024
- Titel
- Putting the Vicious Cycle to the Test: Evidence for the Cognitive Behavioral Model of Persistent Somatic Symptoms from an Online Study.
- Sub types
- Journal Article
Datenquelle: Europe PubMed Central
- Abstract
- OBJECTIVE: In clinical practice, persistent somatic symptoms are regularly explained using a cognitive-behavioral model (CBM). In the CBM, predisposing, perpetuating, and precipitating factors are assumed to interact and to cause the onset and endurance of somatic symptoms. However, these models are rarely investigated in their entirety. METHODS: We conducted an online-survey during the Corona pandemic. 2,114 participants from the general German population completed questionnaires that measured different factors of the CBM. We used state negative affectivity and neuroticism as predisposing factors, fear of a COVID-19 infection as precipitating factor, and somatic symptoms, misinterpretation of bodily symptoms, attention allocation to bodily symptoms, and health anxiety as perpetuating factors. Moreover, we added safety and avoidance behavior as endpoints to the model. We conducted a psychological network analysis to exploratively study the relationships between the model's different factors and tested the assumptions of the CBM by evaluating a structural equation model (SEM) that incorporated all factors of the model. RESULTS: Network analyses revealed clustering in our data: Health anxiety and different cognitive factors are closely related, while somatic symptoms and state negative affectivity are strongly associated. Our SEM showed adequate fit. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings from an exploratory and a confirmatory approach give empirical support for the CBM, suggesting it as a suitable model to explain bodily symptoms in the general population and to possibly guide clinical practice. The network model additionally indicates the necessity to apply an individualized CBM for patients, depending on a preponderance of either persistent somatic symptoms or health concerns.
- Autoren
- Alexander HJ Sahm
- Michael Witthöft
- Josef Bailer
- Daniela Mier
- Autoren-URL
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38666664
- DOI
- 10.1097/PSY.0000000000001313
- eISSN
- 1534-7796
- Zeitschrift
- Psychosom Med
- Sprache
- eng
- Country
- United States
- PII
- 00006842-990000000-00218
- Datum der Veröffentlichung
- 2024
- Status
- Published online
- Titel
- Putting the Vicious Cycle to the Test: Evidence for the Cognitive Behavioral Model of Persistent Somatic Symptoms from an Online Study.
- Sub types
- Journal Article
Datenquelle: PubMed
- Beziehungen:
- Eigentum von