The Vista Paradox: Framing or Contrast?
- Publikationstyp:
- Zeitschriftenaufsatz
- Metadaten:
-
- Autoren
- S Oliver Daum
- Bernhard S Both
- Marco Bertamini
- Heiko Hecht
- Autoren-URL
- https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=fis-test-1&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000369843800024&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
- DOI
- 10.1037/xhp0000119
- eISSN
- 1939-1277
- Externe Identifier
- Clarivate Analytics Document Solution ID: DD3ST
- PubMed Identifier: 26280259
- ISSN
- 0096-1523
- Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
- 6
- Zeitschrift
- JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE
- Schlüsselwörter
- vista paradox
- illusions
- frame
- size perception
- distance perception
- Paginierung
- 1734 - 1747
- Datum der Veröffentlichung
- 2015
- Status
- Published
- Titel
- The Vista Paradox: Framing or Contrast?
- Sub types
- Article
- Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
- 41
Datenquelle: Web of Science (Lite)
- Andere Metadatenquellen:
-
- Autoren
- S Oliver Daum
- Bernhard S Both
- Marco Bertamini
- Heiko Hecht
- DOI
- 10.1037/xhp0000119
- eISSN
- 1939-1277
- ISSN
- 0096-1523
- Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
- 6
- Zeitschrift
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Sprache
- en
- Online publication date
- 2015
- Paginierung
- 1734 - 1747
- Status
- Published online
- Herausgeber
- American Psychological Association (APA)
- Herausgeber URL
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000119
- Datum der Datenerfassung
- 2024
- Titel
- The vista paradox: Framing or contrast?
- Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
- 41
Datenquelle: Crossref
- Abstract
- The vista paradox is the illusion in which an object seen through a window appears to shrink in apparent size (and appears farther away) as the observer approaches the window. Paradoxically, the distal object appears smaller as its visual angle increases. We investigated the effect in four experiments varying object size, distance, point of fixation, and texture of the frame and of the object. In the first experiment, we tried to confirm the illusion and to test the robustness of the phenomenon. In the second experiment, we manipulated where subjects fixated (on the frame or on the object) as well as the texture of the object and the frame. Fixation was essential for the illusion: fixating the frame led to an apparent shrinking of the object, whereas fixation on the object did not. Texture of the frame intensified the apparent shrinking of the object. In a third experiment, we separated the point of fixation from the frame in a between-subjects design. Finally, in Experiment 4, we showed that the paradox does not require a frame, but it requires a fixation on a location different from the object. That is, the window or frame is dispensable for the vista paradox, but fixation is critical.
- Addresses
- Department of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
- Autoren
- S Oliver Daum
- Bernhard S Both
- Marco Bertamini
- Heiko Hecht
- DOI
- 10.1037/xhp0000119
- eISSN
- 1939-1277
- Externe Identifier
- PubMed Identifier: 26280259
- Open access
- false
- ISSN
- 0096-1523
- Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
- 6
- Zeitschrift
- Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
- Schlüsselwörter
- Humans
- Distance Perception
- Form Perception
- Optical Illusions
- Size Perception
- Motion Perception
- Fixation, Ocular
- Adult
- Female
- Male
- Young Adult
- Sprache
- eng
- Medium
- Print-Electronic
- Online publication date
- 2015
- Paginierung
- 1734 - 1747
- Datum der Veröffentlichung
- 2015
- Status
- Published
- Datum der Datenerfassung
- 2015
- Titel
- The vista paradox: Framing or contrast?
- Sub types
- Journal Article
- Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
- 41
Datenquelle: Europe PubMed Central
- Abstract
- The vista paradox is the illusion in which an object seen through a window appears to shrink in apparent size (and appears farther away) as the observer approaches the window. Paradoxically, the distal object appears smaller as its visual angle increases. We investigated the effect in four experiments varying object size, distance, point of fixation, and texture of the frame and of the object. In the first experiment, we tried to confirm the illusion and to test the robustness of the phenomenon. In the second experiment, we manipulated where subjects fixated (on the frame or on the object) as well as the texture of the object and the frame. Fixation was essential for the illusion: fixating the frame led to an apparent shrinking of the object, whereas fixation on the object did not. Texture of the frame intensified the apparent shrinking of the object. In a third experiment, we separated the point of fixation from the frame in a between-subjects design. Finally, in Experiment 4, we showed that the paradox does not require a frame, but it requires a fixation on a location different from the object. That is, the window or frame is dispensable for the vista paradox, but fixation is critical.
- Autoren
- S Oliver Daum
- Bernhard S Both
- Marco Bertamini
- Heiko Hecht
- Autoren-URL
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26280259
- DOI
- 10.1037/xhp0000119
- eISSN
- 1939-1277
- Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
- 6
- Zeitschrift
- J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform
- Schlüsselwörter
- Adult
- Distance Perception
- Female
- Fixation, Ocular
- Form Perception
- Humans
- Male
- Motion Perception
- Optical Illusions
- Size Perception
- Young Adult
- Sprache
- eng
- Country
- United States
- Paginierung
- 1734 - 1747
- PII
- 2015-37263-001
- Datum der Veröffentlichung
- 2015
- Status
- Published
- Datum, an dem der Datensatz öffentlich gemacht wurde
- 2016
- Titel
- The vista paradox: Framing or contrast?
- Sub types
- Journal Article
- Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
- 41
Datenquelle: PubMed
- Beziehungen:
- Eigentum von