Assessing therapist development: Reliability and validity of the Supervisee Levels Questionnaire (SLQ-R)
- Publikationstyp:
- Zeitschriftenaufsatz
- Metadaten:
-
- Autoren
- Yvonne M Junga
- Michael Witthoeft
- Florian Weck
- Autoren-URL
- https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=fis-test-1&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000482507400011&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
- DOI
- 10.1002/jclp.22794
- eISSN
- 1097-4679
- Externe Identifier
- Clarivate Analytics Document Solution ID: IS9ZV
- PubMed Identifier: 31009551
- ISSN
- 0021-9762
- Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
- 9
- Zeitschrift
- JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY
- Schlüsselwörter
- clinical supervision
- exploratory structural equation modeling
- psychotherapy training
- Supervisee Levels Questionnaire
- Paginierung
- 1658 - 1672
- Datum der Veröffentlichung
- 2019
- Status
- Published
- Titel
- Assessing therapist development: Reliability and validity of the Supervisee Levels Questionnaire (SLQ-R)
- Sub types
- Article
- Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
- 75
Datenquelle: Web of Science (Lite)
- Andere Metadatenquellen:
-
- Abstract
- <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Therapist development is a crucial target for clinical training in order to ensure high‐quality psychotherapy. A major challenge in examining therapeutic development is the assessment of developmental processes. The Supervisee Levels Questionnaire (SLQ‐R) was analyzed in this study to examine its validity, reliability, and underlying dimensional structure.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Method</jats:title><jats:p>Seven hundred and sixty therapists participated in an online survey concerning their current psychotherapy training. The factor structure as well as the validity of the SLQ‐R were investigated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>In line with the results of the exploratory factor analyses, a Bifactor ESEM (exploratory structural equation modeling) model with two factors and one global factor provided the best fit to the data. The two factors were labeled <jats:italic>professional self‐confidence</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>professional insecurity</jats:italic>.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Empirical support for reliability and validity of the new factor structure of the SLQ‐R was found. The instrument is useful for assessing the therapist's developmental level.</jats:p></jats:sec>
- Autoren
- Yvonne M Junga
- Michael Witthöft
- Florian Weck
- DOI
- 10.1002/jclp.22794
- eISSN
- 1097-4679
- ISSN
- 0021-9762
- Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
- 9
- Zeitschrift
- Journal of Clinical Psychology
- Sprache
- en
- Online publication date
- 2019
- Paginierung
- 1658 - 1672
- Datum der Veröffentlichung
- 2019
- Status
- Published
- Herausgeber
- Wiley
- Herausgeber URL
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22794
- Datum der Datenerfassung
- 2023
- Titel
- Assessing therapist development: Reliability and validity of the Supervisee Levels Questionnaire (SLQ‐R)
- Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
- 75
Datenquelle: Crossref
- Abstract
- <h4>Background</h4>Therapist development is a crucial target for clinical training in order to ensure high-quality psychotherapy. A major challenge in examining therapeutic development is the assessment of developmental processes. The Supervisee Levels Questionnaire (SLQ-R) was analyzed in this study to examine its validity, reliability, and underlying dimensional structure.<h4>Method</h4>Seven hundred and sixty therapists participated in an online survey concerning their current psychotherapy training. The factor structure as well as the validity of the SLQ-R were investigated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.<h4>Results</h4>In line with the results of the exploratory factor analyses, a Bifactor ESEM (exploratory structural equation modeling) model with two factors and one global factor provided the best fit to the data. The two factors were labeled professional self-confidence and professional insecurity.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Empirical support for reliability and validity of the new factor structure of the SLQ-R was found. The instrument is useful for assessing the therapist's developmental level.
- Addresses
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy, and Experimental Psychopathology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
- Autoren
- Yvonne M Junga
- Michael Witthöft
- Florian Weck
- DOI
- 10.1002/jclp.22794
- eISSN
- 1097-4679
- Externe Identifier
- PubMed Identifier: 31009551
- Open access
- false
- ISSN
- 0021-9762
- Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
- 9
- Zeitschrift
- Journal of clinical psychology
- Schlüsselwörter
- Humans
- Reproducibility of Results
- Psychometrics
- Psychotherapy
- Clinical Competence
- Adult
- Female
- Male
- Surveys and Questionnaires
- Sprache
- eng
- Medium
- Print-Electronic
- Online publication date
- 2019
- Paginierung
- 1658 - 1672
- Datum der Veröffentlichung
- 2019
- Status
- Published
- Datum der Datenerfassung
- 2019
- Titel
- Assessing therapist development: Reliability and validity of the Supervisee Levels Questionnaire (SLQ-R).
- Sub types
- Journal Article
- Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
- 75
Datenquelle: Europe PubMed Central
- Abstract
- BACKGROUND: Therapist development is a crucial target for clinical training in order to ensure high-quality psychotherapy. A major challenge in examining therapeutic development is the assessment of developmental processes. The Supervisee Levels Questionnaire (SLQ-R) was analyzed in this study to examine its validity, reliability, and underlying dimensional structure. METHOD: Seven hundred and sixty therapists participated in an online survey concerning their current psychotherapy training. The factor structure as well as the validity of the SLQ-R were investigated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: In line with the results of the exploratory factor analyses, a Bifactor ESEM (exploratory structural equation modeling) model with two factors and one global factor provided the best fit to the data. The two factors were labeled professional self-confidence and professional insecurity. CONCLUSION: Empirical support for reliability and validity of the new factor structure of the SLQ-R was found. The instrument is useful for assessing the therapist's developmental level.
- Date of acceptance
- 2019
- Autoren
- Yvonne M Junga
- Michael Witthöft
- Florian Weck
- Autoren-URL
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31009551
- DOI
- 10.1002/jclp.22794
- eISSN
- 1097-4679
- Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
- 9
- Zeitschrift
- J Clin Psychol
- Schlüsselwörter
- Supervisee Levels Questionnaire
- clinical supervision
- exploratory structural equation modeling
- psychotherapy training
- Adult
- Clinical Competence
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Psychometrics
- Psychotherapy
- Reproducibility of Results
- Surveys and Questionnaires
- Sprache
- eng
- Country
- United States
- Paginierung
- 1658 - 1672
- Datum der Veröffentlichung
- 2019
- Status
- Published
- Datum, an dem der Datensatz öffentlich gemacht wurde
- 2020
- Titel
- Assessing therapist development: Reliability and validity of the Supervisee Levels Questionnaire (SLQ-R).
- Sub types
- Journal Article
- Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
- 75
Datenquelle: PubMed
- Beziehungen:
- Eigentum von