Repeatability of the Individual Response to the Use of Active Recovery the Day After High-Intensity Interval Training: A Double-Crossover Trial

Publikationstyp:
Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Metadaten:
Autoren
  • Thimo Wiewelhove
  • Constantin Thase
  • Marcel Glahn
  • Anthony Hessel
  • Christoph Schneider
  • Laura Hottenrott
  • Tim Meyer
  • Michael Kellmann
  • Mark Pfeiffer
  • Alexander Ferrauti
Autoren-URL
https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=fis-test-1&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000681364400015&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
DOI
10.1123/ijspp.2020-0671
eISSN
1555-0273
Externe Identifier
  • Clarivate Analytics Document Solution ID: TU9QM
  • PubMed Identifier: 33607623
ISSN
1555-0265
Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
8
Zeitschrift
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSIOLOGY AND PERFORMANCE
Schlüsselwörter
  • recovery interventions
  • repeated-period crossover
  • muscle fatigue
  • muscle soreness
Paginierung
1160 - 1168
Datum der Veröffentlichung
2021
Status
Published
Titel
Repeatability of the Individual Response to the Use of Active Recovery the Day After High-Intensity Interval Training: A Double-Crossover Trial
Sub types
  • Article
Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
16

Datenquelle: Web of Science (Lite)

Andere Metadatenquellen:
Abstract
<jats:p><jats:italic><jats:bold>Purpose</jats:bold>:</jats:italic> To identify whether the use of active recovery (ACT) the day after high-intensity interval training (HIIT) benefits recovery and to assess whether individual responses to ACT are repeatable. <jats:italic><jats:bold>Methods</jats:bold>:</jats:italic> Eleven well-trained, male intermittent-sport athletes (age: 25.5 ± 1.8 y) completed 4 HIIT sessions, each separated by a 2-week washout period. Of the 4 sessions, 2 were followed by passive recovery (PAS) and 2 by 60 minutes of moderate biking (ACT) 24 hours postexercise in the following sequences: ACT→PAS→ACT→PAS or PAS→ACT→PAS→ACT. Before and after HIIT and after 24 and 48 hours of recovery, maximal voluntary isometric strength (MVIC), countermovement jump height (CMJ), tensiomyographic markers of muscle fatigue (TMG), serum concentration of creatine kinase (CK), muscle soreness (MS), and perceived stress state (PS) were determined. <jats:italic><jats:bold>Results</jats:bold>:</jats:italic> A 3-way repeated-measure analysis of variance with a triple-nested random effects model revealed a significant (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; .05) fatigue-related time effect of HIIT on markers of fatigue (MVIC↓; CMJ↓; TMG↑; CK↑; MS↑; PS↑). No significant (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &gt; .05) main effect of recovery strategy was detected. In 9 subjects, the individual results revealed inconsistent and nonrepeatable responses to ACT, while a consistent and repeatable positive or negative response to ACT was found in 2 individuals. <jats:italic><jats:bold>Conclusions</jats:bold>:</jats:italic> The repeated failure of ACT to limit the severity of fatigue was found both at the group level and with most individuals. However, a small percentage of athletes may be more likely to benefit repeatedly from either ACT or PAS. Therefore, the use of ACT should be individualized.</jats:p>
Autoren
  • Thimo Wiewelhove
  • Constantin Thase
  • Marcel Glahn
  • Anthony Hessel
  • Christoph Schneider
  • Laura Hottenrott
  • Tim Meyer
  • Michael Kellmann
  • Mark Pfeiffer
  • Alexander Ferrauti
DOI
10.1123/ijspp.2020-0671
eISSN
1555-0273
ISSN
1555-0265
Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
8
Zeitschrift
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Paginierung
1160 - 1168
Datum der Veröffentlichung
2021
Status
Published
Herausgeber
Human Kinetics
Herausgeber URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2020-0671
Datum der Datenerfassung
2022
Titel
Repeatability of the Individual Response to the Use of Active Recovery the Day After High-Intensity Interval Training: A Double-Crossover Trial
Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
16

Datenquelle: Crossref

Abstract
<h4>Purpose</h4>To identify whether the use of active recovery (ACT) the day after high-intensity interval training (HIIT) benefits recovery and to assess whether individual responses to ACT are repeatable.<h4>Methods</h4>Eleven well-trained, male intermittent-sport athletes (age: 25.5 ± 1.8 y) completed 4 HIIT sessions, each separated by a 2-week washout period. Of the 4 sessions, 2 were followed by passive recovery (PAS) and 2 by 60 minutes of moderate biking (ACT) 24 hours postexercise in the following sequences: ACT→PAS→ACT→PAS or PAS→ACT→PAS→ACT. Before and after HIIT and after 24 and 48 hours of recovery, maximal voluntary isometric strength (MVIC), countermovement jump height (CMJ), tensiomyographic markers of muscle fatigue (TMG), serum concentration of creatine kinase (CK), muscle soreness (MS), and perceived stress state (PS) were determined.<h4>Results</h4>A 3-way repeated-measure analysis of variance with a triple-nested random effects model revealed a significant (P < .05) fatigue-related time effect of HIIT on markers of fatigue (MVIC↓; CMJ↓; TMG↑; CK↑; MS↑; PS↑). No significant (P > .05) main effect of recovery strategy was detected. In 9 subjects, the individual results revealed inconsistent and nonrepeatable responses to ACT, while a consistent and repeatable positive or negative response to ACT was found in 2 individuals.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The repeated failure of ACT to limit the severity of fatigue was found both at the group level and with most individuals. However, a small percentage of athletes may be more likely to benefit repeatedly from either ACT or PAS. Therefore, the use of ACT should be individualized.
Autoren
  • Thimo Wiewelhove
  • Constantin Thase
  • Marcel Glahn
  • Anthony Hessel
  • Christoph Schneider
  • Laura Hottenrott
  • Tim Meyer
  • Michael Kellmann
  • Mark Pfeiffer
  • Alexander Ferrauti
DOI
10.1123/ijspp.2020-0671
eISSN
1555-0273
Externe Identifier
  • PubMed Identifier: 33607623
Open access
false
ISSN
1555-0265
Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
8
Zeitschrift
International journal of sports physiology and performance
Schlüsselwörter
  • Humans
  • Creatine Kinase
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Muscle Fatigue
  • Adult
  • Male
  • Young Adult
  • Myalgia
  • High-Intensity Interval Training
Sprache
eng
Medium
Print-Electronic
Online publication date
2021
Paginierung
1160 - 1168
Datum der Veröffentlichung
2021
Status
Published
Datum der Datenerfassung
2021
Titel
Repeatability of the Individual Response to the Use of Active Recovery the Day After High-Intensity Interval Training: A Double-Crossover Trial.
Sub types
  • Clinical Trial
  • Journal Article
Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
16

Datenquelle: Europe PubMed Central

Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify whether the use of active recovery (ACT) the day after high-intensity interval training (HIIT) benefits recovery and to assess whether individual responses to ACT are repeatable. METHODS: Eleven well-trained, male intermittent-sport athletes (age: 25.5 ± 1.8 y) completed 4 HIIT sessions, each separated by a 2-week washout period. Of the 4 sessions, 2 were followed by passive recovery (PAS) and 2 by 60 minutes of moderate biking (ACT) 24 hours postexercise in the following sequences: ACT→PAS→ACT→PAS or PAS→ACT→PAS→ACT. Before and after HIIT and after 24 and 48 hours of recovery, maximal voluntary isometric strength (MVIC), countermovement jump height (CMJ), tensiomyographic markers of muscle fatigue (TMG), serum concentration of creatine kinase (CK), muscle soreness (MS), and perceived stress state (PS) were determined. RESULTS: A 3-way repeated-measure analysis of variance with a triple-nested random effects model revealed a significant (P < .05) fatigue-related time effect of HIIT on markers of fatigue (MVIC↓; CMJ↓; TMG↑; CK↑; MS↑; PS↑). No significant (P > .05) main effect of recovery strategy was detected. In 9 subjects, the individual results revealed inconsistent and nonrepeatable responses to ACT, while a consistent and repeatable positive or negative response to ACT was found in 2 individuals. CONCLUSIONS: The repeated failure of ACT to limit the severity of fatigue was found both at the group level and with most individuals. However, a small percentage of athletes may be more likely to benefit repeatedly from either ACT or PAS. Therefore, the use of ACT should be individualized.
Date of acceptance
2020
Autoren
  • Thimo Wiewelhove
  • Constantin Thase
  • Marcel Glahn
  • Anthony Hessel
  • Christoph Schneider
  • Laura Hottenrott
  • Tim Meyer
  • Michael Kellmann
  • Mark Pfeiffer
  • Alexander Ferrauti
Autoren-URL
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33607623
DOI
10.1123/ijspp.2020-0671
eISSN
1555-0273
Ausgabe der Veröffentlichung
8
Zeitschrift
Int J Sports Physiol Perform
Schlüsselwörter
  • muscle fatigue
  • muscle soreness
  • recovery interventions
  • repeated-period crossover
  • Adult
  • Creatine Kinase
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • High-Intensity Interval Training
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Muscle Fatigue
  • Myalgia
  • Young Adult
Sprache
eng
Country
United States
Paginierung
1160 - 1168
PII
ijspp.2020-0671
Datum der Veröffentlichung
2021
Status
Published
Datum, an dem der Datensatz öffentlich gemacht wurde
2022
Titel
Repeatability of the Individual Response to the Use of Active Recovery the Day After High-Intensity Interval Training: A Double-Crossover Trial.
Sub types
  • Clinical Trial
  • Journal Article
Ausgabe der Zeitschrift
16

Datenquelle: PubMed

Beziehungen:
Eigentum von

Werkzeuge